So apparently Palin's latest child is actually the child of her daughter. Check it here. Also see this photo, allegedly from Super Tuesday in February, when Palin was supposedly six months pregnant... Wow! Clearly, if this is true, it would rank up there with the whole Eagleton fiasco back in '72... I for one hope the MSM is a little quicker on the uptake here than in recent instances, but I'm not optimistic given everything. We shall see.
(Hat tip to Dan for alerting me to this breaking news)
Found a possibly pregnant pick of Palin's daughter via the above link, and here it is: Possible, no? (She's the one on the right, BTW).. Apparently this is old news anyway, but now it actually might mean something.... We shall see!
Matt is back with another masterpiece of comic timing germane to the topic of this blog post.
So I was reading through some stories about the time of the baby's birth, when I came across this little bit:
In a letter she e-mailed to relatives and close friends Friday after giving birth, Palin wrote, "Many people will express sympathy, but you don't want or need that, because Trig will be a joy. You will have to trust me on this." She wrote it in the voice of and signed it as "Trig's Creator, Your Heavenly Father."So she writes letters to her friends in the "voice of" God? Does that strike anyone else as completely fucking bent, even if in the service of justifying the acceptance of a disabled child? Just saying, strikes me as pretty crazy. Plus, check out another "pregnant" picture of Palin, this one from December:
Found this pick from March in which Palin looks pretty pregnant. Could be a suit, of course, but that would be pretty f'ing crazy in its own right, speaking of crazy... Here's the shot from this site:
Okay, check out this excerpt from the Anchorage Daily News:
Palin said she's already about seven months along, with the baby due to arrive in mid-May.Pretty funny to keep something like a pregnancy secret for so long... Also strange that no one suspected anything, and that all were shocked by the announcement... Very strange.
That the pregnancy is so advanced astonished all who heard the news. The governor, a runner who's always been trim, simply doesn't look pregnant.
New testimony from Alaska HD seems to indicate that again, in her 7th month of pregnancy, Palin did not, in fact, appear pregnant. Here is a video filmed in February by Alaska HD. Watch the beginning if you like local news casts or are a devoted Northern Exposure junky, but fast forward to the 4:00 mark to see the Palin segment. Note her hacking cackle as well, another possible campaign liability (I would know): Judge for yourself, I guess. Doesn't seem that pregnant to me, but who can say? (Is she maybe just a little bit pregnant? --ed.)
More video of Palin pregnant, via Jackie & Fritz: Also check out this site for some attempt at debunking.