As a young man, before I went to boarding school and "became cool" (ie started drinking, grew my hair long, became radically leftist, became obsessed with Wordsworth, then Keats (while being vehemently anti-Shelleyan), Wallace Stevens, Hart Crane, finally returning to Shelley without rejecting Keats, Browning, then flirting intensely with Derrida, Blanchot, Battaile, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Levinas, Husserl, Hegel, Kant, Arendt, before rejecting all of them except a few paragraphs of Nietzsche and returning to a deeper, renewed love for Shelley, Whitman and Emerson, while all the while living out the fantasy-turned-reality of becoming a serious rock, then jazz, musician--Where was I going with this?), I was actually a remarkably huge nerd (Imagine, a "reformed" nerd writing a blog... Unthinkable) who enjoyed playing basketball, reading Walt Whitman and Emerson, watching basketball, and also reading stuff by
this dude, and even more, stuff by
Orson Scott Card.
Even a few non-nerds will have read his classic work,
Ender's Game, which follows a futuristic genius through an insidious battle-school with a living computer program as he saves humanity from parasitical alien insects, called Buggers, I believe... The prose is crisp in the "pot-boiler with moral issues" sense of crisp...
But looking on the Wikipedia article about Card, I see he is a "Democrat" who is against gay rights, along with being basically unilaterally pro-Bush... Odd. This made me remember this truly awful and over-written scene in one of his lesser known works (from his
Homecoming Saga) where a gay man, in order to "continue the species", is forced to have sex with a woman. Here Card tips his hand as an imaginative weakling. His depiction of the spectrum the gay character is capable of in his erotic fantasies is tiny. Given the circumstances, I'm sure any intelligent gay man would have no trouble imagining he was screwing a guy and not a girl. I mean, it's the future of the human race we're talking about...
Imagination issues aside, I think we understand how gays fit into Card's worldview. In the above mentioned series, a set of something like 10 couples have been hand-picked by this massive computer that has their exact genetic information to make a return voyage back to Earth, which humanity has long since abandoned. Among these people, one is gay... But, because gays are useless, colonially speaking, unless they mate, the guy is forced to be straight, at least in as much he is forced to marry and have sex with a woman! They get along fine, of course, and have children, and actually grow to love each other, with the man repressing his homosexuality entirely, except in his affected mannerisms and speech. Happily enough, the colony is a succesful one, yadah yadah.,, Did I mention Card is also a Mormon allegorist? Therefore, moving, as Card wants us to, from the microcosm of the "colonists" (Mormons) back out to the macrocosm of "actual human society" (which should be like the Mormons) we can see the perfectly obvious thing for gays to do: repress their sexuality entirely, reject it as sin and against "continuing the species" (God's Darwinian Telos), and live amongst straights as a straight... But you can keep your lisp if you absolutely must, and, occaisionally, we will tolerate your being "fabulous" as long as your wife is okay with it and the kids are in bed... Great, Orson, really great. Totally aware of the gay psyche, totally prescient. Moron. I think Tony Kushner may have tackled this subject with a little bit more sensitivity in
Angels in America.
Anyway, sorry for the digressive post, but despite my obvious derision for Card's politics and world-view, I'll still probably see the
Ender's Game movie if it ever gets made.