Rumors in Iran are that he was involved in the killings but not directly in the Embassy ordeal. I can't quote anything on that, however...so take it as you will. I personally have no reason to think one way or the other, but I am quite certain that the Bush Administration has nothing to lose by demonizing Ahmadinejad. There was probably a lot of ballot-stuffing in the first round, especially in Tehran, but chances are that he won the second round fairly (more fairly, at least, than G-Dubs won Florida in either 2000 or 2004....). So, when Rumsfeld says that Ahmadinejad is 'no friend to democracy', he's not exactly wrong, but then neither is ol' Donny himself. Democracy was never the issue--profit was. As it is, I still don't think that even this Savage Death Cabal has much to gain from fucking with Iran.
Why? Well, here's one angle: China holds billions of dollars worth of US bonds--this, along with the fact that the Chinese Yuan is at a fixed rate to the US dollar, helps to keep the dollar from crashing in value. China desperately needs oil to continue economic growth, and Iran provides a good amount of that oil.
If Cheney were to give the go-ahead to invade Iran, the flow of Iranian petrol and natural gas to China would be disrupted, and the price of oil would consequently rise dramatically. These two factors (the disruption itself and the resulting increase in global oil prices) would create a tremendous headache for the Chinese, who thereafter wouldn't have any reason to keep their capital tied up in U.S. bonds or their currency fixed to the dollar. The Chinese hold a lot of sway here, and Bushco can't really fuck with that. So, they may still fuck with Iran, but it would be more than a tad suicidal, economically. I don't see it happening.
Unless there is already some sort of secret agreement between the Bush Admin and China (though diplomacy isn't exactly their strong suit)...
7.03.2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
16 comments:
Great, totally great answer to my question. Thanks. And fuck all those who misread your rhetorical bombast as rant. It ain't cant either, bitches!
You folks may be singing a different tune if Iran starts funneling those nukes to the terrorist that bring them across the mexican border in Texas and Arizona..Or maybe you don't live in the south and think it can't reach you''Hummmm. and I said all that without using your favorite word..
a) you're an idiot with no sense of reality.
b) i have family in iran that could easily be killed if the united states attacked, and that actually is a possibility at this point. iran has no nukes, and iran has no relations with salafi extremist groups that would target the US, because those groups hate shi'ites just as much (read a fucking newspaper for the daily atrocities committed in the name of islam against shi'ites in pakistan) as americans. go read a book or something. the world ain't that simple.
Actual Rod, Iran has no nukes?
Can you please name any country in history that has sought nuclear power without nuclear weapons; of course they are going to develop them. You are telling me, that you really take the Iranian governments word that they will not produce any weapons?
Howard... Howard... Could it be, that rascally fellow, Howard the Duck has at last come home to roost? And anonymous, oh anonymous... How I love your sacred anonymity, and how I treasure your subtle cajoling!
Fugue in Asia Minor
Atoms spin faster, circling the Persian Gulf, spinning like
spiral galaxies deep in a night sky. There, at Bushehr
they gyre, and the Persians raise stakes ever so higher.
And the Earth spins sunward in through the night and spiraling,
spiraling toward a crescendo of ire. So the world learns
of the breathers of fire. Revolution, and spinning, enriching
the liars. I run from Iran, and I ran and I ran.
This centrifugation, this fugue in Asia Minor,
Alas! And higher! To the shores of spinning turbans and turbines,
and then one octave higher, and Tehran knew why, I ran
from Iran, spinning upon this funeral pyre.
Notes:
Fugue - An imitative polyphonic composition in which a theme or themes are stated successively in all of the voices of the contrapuntal structure.
Bushehr - pop. 132,824 (1991), is a city on the southwestern coast of Iran, facing the Persian Gulf, and the chief seaport of the country. Location is about 400 km south of Tehran. The local climate is hot and humid.
Bushehr is near (12 km) the site of a nuclear power plant being built in cooperation with Russia. The work actually started as a Siemens project to build two reactors in 1974, but the revolution in 1979 halted work when one reactor was 85% complete. The reactors were then damaged by multiple Iraqi air strikes between 1984 and 1988.
In 1995, Russia signed a contract to supply a light water reactor for the plant. Although the agreements calls for the spent fuel rods to be sent back to Russia for reprocessing, the US has expressed concern that Iran would reprocess the rods itself, in order to obtain plutonium and pursue its quest for an atomic bomb.
actual rod, are you telling me that Iranian shi't terrorist groups like Hezbollah (party of god my ass) wouldn't target the US if they could? read a fucking newspaper for the daily atrocities committed in the name of islam by shi'ts against anyone; Iran with nukes is bad news, period.
That poem is dedicated to Nostradmus, who combines prophecy and poetry to scintillating effect. Bravo Nos!
I'm deeply moved. Thank you Wallace Stevens. Also, thanks to my deepest poetic influence, Richard Pryor.
Oh yeah, and PS to Howard:
My favorite word is effluence. Look it up, illiterate old drone.
This may be the first double-digit post on the Yale Blogosphere.
Iran has no nukes. Period. If it did, the Israelis would know about it and certainly notify the US.
As for countries with nuclear power but without nuclear weapons...to name a few--Japan, Germany, Australia, Brazil...
In fact, every country that signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty has a legal right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Iran, in trying to build reactors and have its own full fuel cell (ie enrich its own uranium), is expressing FULLY LEGAL rights. It's position is completely legal at this point, and the United States is in fact breaking international law and the CTBT by attempting to stifle that--no ifs, ands, or buts. That is the truth, and any expressions of fear that if atomic energy is developed then "Iran will have the bomb" are irrational and, frankly, racist. Just because we aren't white doesn't mean we're any more dangerous than any other country with full nuclear capability.
In addition, Iran hasn't attacked a nonagressor country in centuries (even the big bad Islamic Republic has not, so no matter how you twist the facts, there's no historical precedent that points to them as an aggressor nation).
You cannot say the same for the United States. Bigot.
I don't know who this anonymous commentor is, but his IP address indicates he is from that bastion of intellect and good-choice-making, Gainesville, Florida. Way to stick to your guns AR, these morons will never learn...
Japan can easily develop nukes, by the hundreds, if they felt threatened enough by North Korea. Second, Brazil and Argentina nearly had a Nucl. arms race of their own, but this was diverted because of good diplomacy etc. It is naive to think Iran will not make Nuclear weapons, as we have seen in the past, this would work in their national interest. For example, North Korea: by nuclear blackmail they have gained economic subsidies from many nations. Last, Iran may not have attacked another country in many centuries, but they are a "state-sponsor of terrorism" as you even readily admit in some of your other posts. They absolutely are an aggresor nation.
--Bigot
as far as attempting to remain anonymous, why would anyone want to leave their name, you folks can get down right nasty, not to mention arrogant.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8443649/site/newsweek/
Don't worry, Howard, we know who you are. As to our arrogance, maybe you should look a little bit more closely at the blog before you take us too seriously. As to nasty, well, yes, guilty as charged.
Post a Comment